The global energy transition is accelerating, and with this is the shift to renewable generation. But this shift to “clean generation” is not a simple one. There are significant challenges with this wholesale shift when you consider the circular economy. Without a long-term strategic view, it raises questions about the sustainability of this green transition.
As Groundlines General Manager for Australia & New Zealand, I’ve spent over 20 years in the energy sector. The shift to renewable generation is one of the most exciting—and complex—developments I’ve seen. But all is not what it seems.
The global shift to renewable generation and the move away from fossil fuels have had a huge impact on nearly every sector across the globe. The opportunities created because of this are massive, and I don’t see this slowing down for many years to come. However, with the urgency to transition to a cleaner, greener future to slow global warming, it seems like our strategic views have shortened to 2030 or perhaps 2050.
But what lies beyond that? What does that future look like further out? Yes, we may have hundreds of wind farms on our horizon, solar panels on every bit of available space to generate free energy and vehicles driving around silently on battery power charged from green electricity. Perfect!
But are we doing enough to ensure the legacy that is left in 50 years’ time is not setting up another disaster that requires a global shift to resolve? How is all the infrastructure associated with this renewable generation going to be dealt with when it is end-of-life or upgraded? What role does the circular economy play today, and what should be our longer-term circular economy strategies?
As our demand for renewables grows, there are some scary numbers coming down the line:
It can be discouraging when, as designers, we suggest more sustainable alternatives—such as using green concrete, reducing steel quantities to lower manufacturing emissions, or repurposing existing structures—only to see these options dismissed as soon as cost becomes an issue. In the grand scheme, these measures often seem minor, and financial considerations too frequently totally outweigh environmental benefits.
Just because we can, doesn’t mean to say we do.
It is not hard to do some simple research to understand that a large percentage of renewable generation components are already recyclable. This part has mostly been done very well:
However, the reality of what is ultimately recycled presents a markedly different scenario:
So, one can only assume that what is not recycled ends up in a landfill. Remember what used to happen with used tyres?
There are, of course, challenges to recycling, such as:
However, it is not all doom and gloom, and there are innovations that are underway to improve recyclability:
So, there is some light at the end of the tunnel, but there is a lot of work still to do across the entire energy sector.
The global energy transition is well underway, and the momentum toward renewable generation is both necessary and inspiring. Yet, as we build the infrastructure for a cleaner future, we must also look beyond immediate climate goals and consider the long-term sustainability of our energy systems. The shift to renewables is not without complexity, and without a strategic focus on circular economy principles, we risk creating new environmental challenges even as we solve old ones.
While many renewable technologies are highly recyclable in theory, actual recycling rates remain low. This gap must be addressed urgently. There are encouraging examples, but these efforts must be scaled across the entire energy sector.
Now is the time to act.
Industry leaders, governments, and innovators must work together to:
The clean energy revolution must not only be green—it must be circular. Let’s ensure the legacy we leave is one of resilience, responsibility, and regeneration.
#EnergyTransition #Renewables #circularity #CleanEnergy #Sustainability #ThoughtLeadership #Infrastructure #SmartGrid #NetZero
For over a decade Thor Poletest™ has provided networks with PHI™ (Pole Health Index™) - the gold standard in objective and accurate pole condition data and made possible by a simple 60-second non-destructive hammer test at the base of the pole.
The SZ Route is a 93 span 132kV Overhead Line made of PL16 Type Towers. It was due for reconductoring and modernisation in 2021. The route was made up of 132kV Lynx Phase and Earthwire and there was a desire to restring this line with Single Upas and 96 Fibre OPGW.
Introducing Ciara Gurhy, Project Manager on the PMO team!
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
Unordered list
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
For over a decade Thor Poletest™ has provided networks with PHI™ (Pole Health Index™) - the gold standard in objective and accurate pole condition data and made possible by a simple 60-second non-destructive hammer test at the base of the pole.
The SZ Route is a 93 span 132kV Overhead Line made of PL16 Type Towers. It was due for reconductoring and modernisation in 2021. The route was made up of 132kV Lynx Phase and Earthwire and there was a desire to restring this line with Single Upas and 96 Fibre OPGW.
Introducing Ciara Gurhy, Project Manager on the PMO team!